![]() It was as if the director was telling a story (of two women in a relationship) that they didn't actually want to tell at all. Not only did neither of the women present as "masculine" in any way, but the men "playing" the women did not at all feel the women they supposed were playing. Even simple scenes where the two women might be sleeping next to the other, or having breakfast, had one of them as a man. ![]() If it were 50/50 it might have worked a little, but this was 100% of them. The sex scenes were clumsy for the most part, which I guess comes down to the use of non-actors (all dancers) though again, for me it was just the jarring fact that every one of them were depicted as opposite sex versions of themselves. Why have a story about two women and hardly ever show them as women? There were so few scenes with them both who they actually were (women) that it made it impossible for any sort of character development to happen, and the chemistry between the various "alter" couplings was practically nil. Could they, maybe, in some other form? Yes, I can imagine it though I still don't see the point. To me, the ENTIRE conceit that these two women had "male" inner/alter egos just did not work on ANY level. ![]() Many have either knocked it for "not enough dance" or not "good enough" dance, which are valid but actually sit well down the list for me as to what is wrong. I don't normally "pile on" when there are already fairly negative reviews, but even going in with an open mind (and low expectations) wasn't enough to prepare me for HOW frustrating this film was.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |